Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case regulation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
A lower court may well not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it really is unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question. When the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it may possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts of your cases; some jurisdictions allow for any judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have read the learned counsel for that parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 to hand over possession in the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs being decided from the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer within the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this element for interim custody of the subject premises if the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to around the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can deliver inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding attained with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to make it acceptable for the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified via the decision from the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
Since the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is reached, therefore the decision in the Supreme Court needs being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in aid from the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. Given that the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, the decision of your Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. Read more
Because of this, only citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling another person to tell them you’ve found their missing phone, then telling them you live in this kind of-and-these types of community, without actually supplying them an address. Driving across the community attempting to find their phone is probably going to be more frustrating than it’s worthy of.
Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue assistance with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.
Summaries offer concise explanations of legal principles and significant cases pertaining to land ownership, real estate transactions, property rights, and related matters, aiding you in understanding the intricacies of land and property law.
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case legislation inside of a particular court. Indeed, Every single circuit has its personal list of binding case law. As a result, a judgment rendered during the Ninth Circuit will not be binding during the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar trouble. When they sue their landlord, the case law on order 7 rule 11 court must make use of the previous court’s decision in applying the law. This example of case regulation refers to 2 cases heard within the state court, within the same level.
Where there are several members of a court deciding a case, there may be one particular or more judgments specified (or reported). Only the reason for the decision on the majority can constitute a binding precedent, but all can be cited as persuasive, or their reasoning might be adopted in an argument.
These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory regulation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are established by executive companies based on statutes.